🔗 Share this article

For months, coercive communications recurred. At first, supposedly from an ex-law enforcement official and a retired army general, and then from law enforcement directly. Ultimately, a local artisan states he was ordered to the local precinct and warned explicitly: stop speaking out or encounter real trouble.

Shaikh is one of many resisting a expensive project where this historic settlement – a massive informal community with rich history – is scheduled to be demolished and transformed by a multinational conglomerate.

"The culture of Dharavi is unparalleled in the world," states Shaikh. "Yet the plan aims to destroy our community and stop us speaking out."

Contrasting Realities

The narrow alleys of the slum sit in stark contrast to the high-rise structures and luxury apartments that dominate the settlement. Dwellings are built haphazardly and typically without proper sanitation, small-scale operations release harmful emissions and the atmosphere is filled with the unpleasant stench of uncovered waste channels.

Among some individuals, the prospect of a renewed Dharavi into a modern district of premium apartments, well-maintained green spaces, contemporary malls and homes with proper sanitation is a hopeful vision achieved.

"There's no adequate medical facilities, roads or sewage systems and we have no places for youth to recreate," says a tea vendor, 56, who migrated from Tamil Nadu in 1982. "The single option is to tear it all down and provide modern residences."

Local Protest

However, some, like Shaikh, are fighting against the project.

All recognize that Dharavi, long neglected as unauthorized settlement, is desperately requiring economic input and modernization. But they are concerned that this initiative – without public consultation – might transform a piece of prime Mumbai real estate into a luxury development, forcing out the lower-caste, working-class residents who have resided there since the nineteenth century.

It was these excluded, displaced people who developed the vacant wetlands into a widely studied marvel of community resilience and commercial output, whose production is worth between $1m and two million dollars annually, making it a major unregulated sectors.

Relocation Worries

Among approximately one million people living in the dense sprawling area, a minority will be eligible for replacement housing in the development, which is estimated to take a significant period to finish. Others will be transferred to barren areas and coastal regions on the remote edges of Mumbai, threatening to divide a generations-old neighborhood. Certain individuals will be denied homes at all.

People eligible to stay in the area will be allocated units in high-rise buildings, a significant rupture from the evolved, shared lifestyle of dwelling and laboring that has supported Dharavi for generations.

Commercial activities from tailoring to clay work and waste processing are expected to shrink in number and be transferred to an allocated "business area" distant from homes.

Survival Challenge

In the case of the leather artisan, a leather artisan and third generation of his family to live in the slum, the project presents an existential threat. His rickety, three-storey facility produces garments – sharp blazers, luxury coats, fashionable garments – sold in luxury boutiques in the city's affluent areas and internationally.

His family resides in the spaces downstairs and laborers and tailors – workers from different regions – live in the same building, allowing him to sustain operations. Beyond Dharavi's enclave, housing costs are typically tenfold costlier for a single room.

Harassment and Intimidation

In the administrative buildings close by, a visual representation of the transformation initiative shows an alternative outlook. Well-groomed people move around on bicycles and e-vehicles, buying continental bread and croissants and having coffee on a terrace adjacent to a restaurant and Ice-Cream. This represents a complete departure from the 20-rupee idli sambar breakfast and 5-rupee chai that supports the neighborhood.

"This represents no development for us," explains the protester. "It's a huge property transaction that will render it impossible for residents to remain."

Furthermore, there's skepticism of the corporate group. Managed by an influential industrialist – among the country's wealthiest and a supporter of the national leader – the corporation has been subject to claims of favoritism and ethical concerns, which it disputes.

While administrative bodies labels it a joint project, the developer contributed nearly a billion dollars for its 80% stake. A case claiming that the redevelopment was unfairly awarded to the business group is pending in the nation's highest judicial body.

Continued Intimidation

Since they began to publicly resist the development, protesters and community members state they have been subjected to ongoing efforts of coercion and warning – involving messages, clear intimidation and implications that opposing the initiative was comparable with anti-national sentiment – by figures they assert work for the business conglomerate.

Part of the group accused of making intimidations is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c