🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to restart nuclear negotiations with Washington provided that it is approached with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has stated.

Abbas Araghchi stated solely negotiations was effective, and disclosed recent overtures had originated from mediators to restart talks with the Trump administration. He said Iran had zero secret atomic facilities, and Tehran had not yet reached a point to allow the International Atomic Energy Agency to visit attacked atomic facilities for security reasons.

Walking a Challenging Course

The foreign minister is navigating a difficult course since Iran wishes not to appear to be acting from a position of vulnerability, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had arisen stronger in military terms and emotionally from the coordinated strike on its atomic facilities in June.

He was speaking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an inalienable right to enrich uranium within its borders that it will perpetually retain" – the key factor of the stalemate in the prior discussions.

Prior Discussions Abruptly Ended

The earlier sessions of talks between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and hostile conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, targeted Tehran's atomic facilities in a 12-day war that culminated with Donald Trump declaring the facilities had been obliterated. Afterward, Western states exercised their privilege to restore UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a substantial consequence.

Perfect Agreement Suggested

Tehran representatives said they felt they had achieved a "ideal resolution" to the nuclear fuel concern in previous talks, when it was agreed an domestic cooperative with US participation could process nuclear material. The two nations would have been able to declare success since local refinement would have remained and the US could be assured that Iran's nuclear programme was entirely non-military.

It had not been decided in the negotiations that American atomic experts could operate within Iranian territory, but that was a reasonable assumption of the cooperative offer. Representatives claimed repeatedly they had secured an understanding with Trump's special envoy the US official only for the deal to collapse due to "spoilers in Washington".

Existing Position

Iranian officials declared the partnership proposal was now withdrawn, but it seems very probable the offer could be reintroduced in various formats if discussions resume.

The US president in recent days claimed he had been receiving messages that Iran desired to resume discussions, but confidentially Iran's diplomats state they are not yet receiving coherent offers from Washington either directly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, Egypt, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been criticized of inactivity in the aftermath of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran says diplomacy is not part of a show.

Diplomatic Standpoint

In his remarks to the forum, intended to portray the US as a hegemonic power that exploits the notion of worldwide standards, the foreign minister declared the two-week conflict revealed the conflict could not be resolved by combat operations. He asserted the assaults started with a American requirement for an unconditional Iranian surrender and culminated with an unconditional call for a ceasefire.

Iran is convinced the first strikes by Israel were mounted with full US knowledge and coordination, making faith difficult to rebuild.

Dialogue Stays the Primary Resolution

The foreign minister stated: "It was not Iran that had deserted diplomacy; it was the United States and the Western nations that had consistently sought to enforce their desires during the discussions. Negotiations can still be active and remains the primary solution to resolve disagreements, but its standards, guidelines and fundamentals must be followed."

"If they speak to the nation of Iran with the language of dignity and respect, they will obtain a response in the equivalent tone."

Recovery and Recovery

In what is characterized by Tehran representatives as the struggle of restoration and recovery, the foreign minister said he was assured Iran's defence capabilities "have significantly improved than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been reestablished. We learned numerous insights from this engagement; we have come to know our own weaknesses and the vulnerabilities of the adversary."

He continued: "We managed to survive this engagement. Our nuclear technology, which they planned to eliminate, remains in place. The sites and machinery, if damaged, will be restored; what is essential is the determination of the citizens of Tehran and then the unity of the country that they sought to undermine, but failed to break. The Iranian people have grown more resilient, more integrated, and more backing of the leadership and the state in the wake of this assault."